All, As indicated in the minutes from Prague [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a general hum in favor of the architecture document: """ 1. for arch doc, do we want a milestone for architecture. Humming: in favor. 2. is the document a good basis for the milestone? Humming: in favor. """ This email is to initiate a two week adoption call for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-larose-capport-architecture/ Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague. Thanks, -Erik
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature