All,
As indicated in the minutes from Prague
[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a
general hum in favor of the architecture document:
"""
1. for arch doc, do we want a milestone for architecture. Humming: in favor.
2. is the document a good basis for the milestone? Humming: in favor.
"""
This email is to initiate a two week adoption call for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-larose-capport-architecture/
Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.
Thanks,
-Erik
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature