[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection
I support adopting the API document, expecting some changes to the details of the API itself, which I believe the authors also said they expected.
David Dolson
Sandvine
Original Message
From: Erik Kline
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection
All,
As indicated in the minutes from Prague
[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a
general hum in favor of the API document:
"""
4. API document: do we need a milestone? Humming: in favor.
5. Is this document a good basis. Humming in favor.
""""
This email is to initiate a two week call for adoption for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-donnelly-capport-detection/
Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.
Thanks,
-Erik