Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that we should strictly avoid synthesizing URLs in general,
> and should try to avoid .well-known URLs in particular. Sometimes
> you're forced to use .well-known (e.g., when there's literally no way
> to get a full URL to the client), but that doesn't seem to be the case
> here.
Is it reasonable for different enforcements points to return different URLs
to different clients? If so, that solves much of the multi-tenancy problems,
and I guess I recant some of my previous message.
I'd still like to register a /.well-known value as a suggestion.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature