Security Intelligence [Was: Re: Netblock reassigned from Chile to US ISP...]

[fergdawgster at gmail.com (Paul Ferguson)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM, James Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> An in-depth strategy with hundreds or thousands of factors  examined
> results in a smaller
> (but still present) possibility of the filter/detector being fooled.
>
> IP-based methods can be combined with the other stronger analysis of
> transaction details and other info that can be gathered about a
> submitter  for detection of attempted abuse.
>

Personally, I don;t NANOG is the proper forum for this discussion.

There are other forums, however, which do follow these issues -- some
public, some private.

If folks think that people are not "doing" massive correlation of criminal
activity on the Internet, they would be mistaken.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)

wj8DBQFJQ3JBq1pz9mNUZTMRAjqTAKD30/yrEYWu1ep4v7cOH2q3++aKRQCg2Sad
wwap7dwpUiOv6r/w5st04KQ=
=AZDw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/