[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3

Subject: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:55:27 +0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <006601c96822$f9cb0b20$ed612160$@com> <[email protected]>

On Saturday 27 December 2008 09:08:50 pm Martin List-
Petersen wrote:

> Only if the vendors pick up on those changes.

Juniper support this since JunOS 9.2 (draft-ietf-ospf-af-
alt-06.txt).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20081227/21ed6c2b/attachment.bin>

References:
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: devangnp at gmail.com (devang patel)
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: trejrco at gmail.com (TJ)
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: martin at airwire.ie (Martin List-Petersen)

Prev by Date: Attacking a critical Internet infrastructure
Next by Date: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
Previous by thread: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
Next by thread: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread