[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3

Subject: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven M. Bellovin)
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:23:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:37:41 -0800
"Kevin Oberman" <oberman at es.net> wrote:

> The main reason I prefer ISIS is that it uses CLNS packets for
> communications and we don't route CLNS. (I don't think ANYONE is
> routing CLNS today.) That makes it pretty secure.

Unless, of course, someone one hop away -- a peer?  a customer?  an
upstream or downstream? someone on the same LAN at certain exchange
points? -- sends you a CLNP packet at link level...

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: jmalcolm at uraeus.com (Joe Malcolm)
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: oberman at es.net (Kevin Oberman)

References:
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: devangnp at gmail.com (devang patel)
- IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
  - From: oberman at es.net (Kevin Oberman)

Prev by Date: What to do when your ISP off-shores tech support
Next by Date: What to do when your ISP off-shores tech support
Previous by thread: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
Next by thread: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread