[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

dnscurve and DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky

Subject: dnscurve and DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
From: dotis at mail-abuse.org (Douglas Otis)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:07:16 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 8/5/09 7:05 PM, Naveen Nathan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:17:01PM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> It seems to me that the situation is no worse than DNSSEC, since in both
>> cases the software at each hop needs to be aware of the security stuff, or
>> you fall back to plain unsigned DNS.
>
> I might misunderstand how dnscurve works, but it appears that dnscurve
> is far easier to deploy and get running. The issue is merely coverage.

There might be issues related to intellectual property use. :^(

-Doug

References:
- Dan Kaminsky
  - From: cmaurand at xyonet.com (Curtis Maurand)
- DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: bert.hubert at netherlabs.nl (bert hubert)
- DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: regnauld at catpipe.net (Phil Regnauld)
- DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven M. Bellovin)
- dnscurve and DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- dnscurve and DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
  - From: naveen at calpop.com (Naveen Nathan)

Prev by Date: A DNSSEC irony
Next by Date: DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
Previous by thread: dnscurve and DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
Next by thread: DNS hardening, was Re: Dan Kaminsky
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread