[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.

Subject: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:39:50 +0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <B5F945E48C137C49A98BC86DD35939C012DFA2D012@nbg01-exch-01.entlstaff.domain.lumison.net> <[email protected]>

On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> there are two things you care about: storm control and port security  
> (mac address counting).

Chopping up the layer-2 broadcast domain for a given VLAN into smaller  
pieces via pVLANs can't hurt, either, as long as the hosts have no  
need to talk to one another - and it has other benefits, as well.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical
insights.

			-- xkcd #625

Follow-Ups:
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
  - From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
  - From: sean at donelan.com (Sean Donelan)

References:
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
  - From: Peter.George at lumison.net (Peter George)
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
  - From: nick at foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)

Prev by Date: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
Next by Date: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
Previous by thread: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
Next by thread: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread