[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Redundancy & Summarization
- Subject: Redundancy & Summarization
- From: Jonathan.Gaynor at fccc.edu (Gaynor, Jonathan)
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:57:49 -0400
My institution has a single /16 spread across 2 sites: the lower /17 is
used at site A, the upper /17 at site B. Sites A & B are connected
internally. Currently both sites have their own ISPs and only advertise
their own /17's. For redundancy we proposed that each site advertise
both their own /17 and the whole /16, so that an ISP failure at either
site would trigger traffic from both /17s to reconverge towards the
unaffected location.
My worry/question: will carriers down the line auto-summarize my
advertisements into a single /16, resulting in a 'load sharing' while
both sites are active? If you're a backbone carrier and you saw x.x/16
and x.x/17 (or x.x/16 and x.x.128/17) being advertised from the same
peer would you drop the longer match?
Regards and thanks,
Jon Gaynor, Senior Network Engineer
Fox Chase Cancer Center
(215) 214-4267, jonathan.gaynor at fccc.edu