[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FTTH Active vs Passive

Subject: FTTH Active vs Passive
From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:12:29 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:33:20PM -0500, Paul Wall wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dan White <dwhite at olp.net> wrote:
> > All valid points. Deploying a strand to each customer from the CO/Cabinet
> > is a good way to future proof your plant.
> 
> I would argue that every customer is entitled to duplex fiber.
> 
> Drive Slow,
> Paul Wall

	nifty... my own fiber pair - and I'll run 32 lambdas on each...
	(can I has kewl new rare-earth glass ... so I can run 100G per lambda? - plz?)

--bill

References:
- FTTH Active vs Passive
  - From: justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)
- FTTH Active vs Passive
  - From: dwhite at olp.net (Dan White)
- FTTH Active vs Passive
  - From: pauldotwall at gmail.com (Paul Wall)

Prev by Date: FTTH Active vs Passive
Next by Date: FTTH Active vs Passive
Previous by thread: FTTH Active vs Passive
Next by thread: FTTH Active vs Passive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread