[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
- Subject: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?
- From: johnl at iecc.com (John R. Levine)
- Date: 11 Dec 2009 21:06:35 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1260582204.4148.130.camel@petrie>
- References: <[email protected]> <1260582204.4148.130.camel@petrie>
So write to her from a gmail account. APEWS is pretty kooky, and I'm kind
of surprised if SORBS is using it.
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
>>> ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
>>> Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
>>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
>>
>> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
>> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
>> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
>> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
>
> Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
> what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
> think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
> ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
>
> I think it is kind of fail that RBL people do not have e-mail based
> contact addresses. Snoozenet is unpleasant to deal with.
>
> William
>
>
Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.