[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IGMP and PIM protection

Subject: IGMP and PIM protection
From: sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net (Stefan Fouant)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:24:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm at emanon.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:27 AM
> To: Glen Kent
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IGMP and PIM protection
> 
> But IGMP IS the control traffic with users.  And PIM IS the control
> traffic between multicast routers.

I think OP meant that he only wants an integrity check of the control
traffic, not confidentiality, hence the statement that he does not want to
encrypt the control traffic.

Stefan Fouant
www.shortestpathfirst.net
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D

Follow-Ups:
- IGMP and PIM protection
  - From: tkapela at gmail.com (Anton Kapela)
- IGMP and PIM protection
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)

References:
- IGMP and PIM protection
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- IGMP and PIM protection
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Dobbins, Roland)
- IGMP and PIM protection
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- IGMP and PIM protection
  - From: swm at emanon.com (Scott Morris)

Prev by Date: IGMP and PIM protection
Next by Date: FYI, new USG Cybersecurity Coordinator ...
Previous by thread: IGMP and PIM protection
Next by thread: IGMP and PIM protection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread