[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ip-precedence for management traffic
- Subject: ip-precedence for management traffic
- From: jgreco at ns.sol.net (Joe Greco)
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:56:53 -0600 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <00a001ca88aa$f05dfdf0$d119f9d0$@com> from "TJ" at Dec 29, 2009 12:18:24 PM
> My $.02 or so - This "widespread castration" would force application
> developers to jump through the same NAT-traversal hoops all over again,
> adding more code-bloat / operational overhead and stifling innovation.
> Naturally, once created, this lower-class of internet user would probably
> become the "norm" and force a race to the bottom in terms of capabilities
> and performance (or perhaps, another "arms race" between the proxy
> implementations and the proxy avoidance implementations) ...
> rinse-repeat-fail_to_learn, all over again.
That was kind of my point.
> /TJ
> PS - could we choose a different term; "cut-rate castration" brings
> unpleasant medical-accidents to mind ...
How about "net neuterality."
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.