[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

multicast nightmare #42

Subject: multicast nightmare #42
From: source_route at yahoo.com (Philip Lavine)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:19:51 -0700 (PDT)

Please explain how this would be possible:

1 sender
1 mcast group
1 receiver
----------------
 = no data loss

1 sender
1 mcast group
2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment
--------------------
= data loss

Follow-Ups:
- multicast nightmare #42
  - From: aforestal at wolve.com (Forestal, Andre Jr.)
- multicast nightmare #42
  - From: adrian.minta at gmail.com (Adrian Minta)
- multicast nightmare #42 - REDUX
  - From: source_route at yahoo.com (Philip Lavine)

Prev by Date: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering]
Next by Date: multicast nightmare #42
Previous by thread: Seeking old NANOG list mbox archives
Next by thread: multicast nightmare #42
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread