[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
2009.10.21 NANOG47 day 3 notes
- Subject: 2009.10.21 NANOG47 day 3 notes
- From: jbates at brightok.net (Jack Bates)
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:56:31 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Ray Soucy wrote:
> Would be a good idea to stop spreading the false assumption that "ipv6
> enable" determines whether or not IPv6 is active on an interface.
>
Play with IPv6 and is-is enough on a Cisco router, and you'll enable it
as a matter of practice too. It's the definitive way to say "yes, this
interface needs IPv6 active and I don't care if there's an address bound
or not". I forget the exact circumstances, but I ran into several
cases where I had undesired results and needed to manually enable IPv6
on an interface. Oh, and different versions of IOS behave differently
towards IPv6. Imagine that.
Jack