[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

Subject: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: thegameiam at yahoo.com (David Barak)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

----- Original Message ----
>From: Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
>Then again, if we remove all the improvements from IPv6 what's the point of adopting it?

How about?"IPv4 address depletion?"

I'm perfectly happy with how my network works.? I do, however, want it to keep growing, and this requires more addresses.??

The requirement for organizations with thousands (or in some cases millions)?of deployed customers to dramatically change how they can associate an IP address with customer ports (or provide remote configuration of said customers' devices) is not an attractive feature.

David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com

References:
- IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)
- IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
  - From: andy at nosignal.org (Andy Davidson)
- IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)

Prev by Date: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
Next by Date: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
Previous by thread: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
Next by thread: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread