[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Redundant Data Center Architectures
- Subject: Redundant Data Center Architectures
- From: ray.sanders at villagevoicemedia.com (Ray Sanders)
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:42:51 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <98F9072C6B4A354486105E1679432E130C34AC8EF4@NOVAMAIL.novadatacom.local> <[email protected]>
Roland,
Could you elaborate on "GSLB" (Global Load Balancing?) ? Pardon if
that question seems a bit "noob-ish"
Thanks
Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering what are the growing trends in connecting Data Centers
>> for redundancy in DR/COOP environments.
>
> 'DR' is an obsolete 40-year-old mainframe concept; it never works, as
> funding/testing/scaling of the 'backup' systems is never adequate
> and/or allowed.
>
> Layer-2 between sites is evil, as well.
>
> Layer-3-independence and active/active/etc. is where it's at in terms
> of high availability in the 21st Century. GSLB, et. al.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical
> insights.
>
> -- xkcd #625
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.36/2465 - Release Date: 10/28/09 09:34:00
>
>
--
-"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future."
-Niels Bohr
--
Ray Sanders
Linux Administrator
Village Voice Media
Office: 602-744-6547
Cell: 602-300-4344