[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL

Subject: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
From: george at montco.net (George Carey)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:30:03 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <1256756748.2228.9.camel@nld06907> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

We like PPPoE on the edge because we can use RADIUS to apply policy to  
the subscribers for bandwidth management, class-of-service, SNPs, etc.  
You probably have some of these features via your DSLAM, but we found  
it easier to do via RADIUS with a web based GUI for our provisioning  
folks. So if we need to snip someone's Internet and leave voice or VPN  
packets alone due to an abuse issue for example, we can apply the  
policy that references the appropriate ACL.

George
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2417 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20091028/7072cb9a/attachment.bin>

References:
- ip options
  - From: bit.gossip at chello.nl (Luca Tosolini)
- ip options
  - From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)
- PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
  - From: jdupuy-list at socket.net (JD)

Prev by Date: ALTDB Problems
Next by Date: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
Previous by thread: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
Next by thread: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread