[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Network Ring
- Subject: Network Ring
- From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:04:45 +0200 (CEST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <1E8B940C5E21014AB8BE70B975D40EDB0162881C@bert.HiberniaAtlantic.local> <[email protected]>
> Rod Beck wrote:
> > What is EAPS?
>
> A joke of a "standard" and something to be avoided at all costs. I
> would echo the last part about Extreme switches too.
Disagree. I don't believe anybody would claim EAPS is a "standard"
just because an RFC has been published. In any case, EAPS is working
quite well for us, with rapid L2 rerouting in ring based structures.
And *much* simpler than RSTP/MST. Or VPLS, for that matter.
As for Extreme switches - they have their strengths and weaknesses,
just like any other product. We use lots of Summit X450/X450a, for
L2 only, and have been generally reasonably happy with them. If I
could buy a similarly featured product from Cisco, for a similar
price, I might well choose Cisco. But at least in our case Cisco
*doesn't* have a competitive product (case in point: ME3400 - too
few ports, too few MAC addresses, funky licensing even if you just
want to do simple QinQ).
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
- References:
- Network Ring
- From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- Network Ring
- From: Rod.Beck at hiberniaatlantic.com (Rod Beck)
- Network Ring
- From: justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)