[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP

Subject: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
From: Stefan.Fouant at neustar.biz (Fouant, Stefan)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:48:46 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <m2ljlelry8.wl%[email protected]><[email protected]><m263bpot1j.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cord MacLeod [mailto:cordmacleod at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:50 PM
> To: North American Network Operators Group
> Subject: Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
> 
> I'd also add that ISIS supports IPv6 through the addition of TLVs
> whereas OSPF was redesigned into OSPFv3.
> 
> Personally I like ISIS due to it's simplicity and use it for router
> loopback advertisement only.

Cord, so you've piqued my interest.  Are you saying you run ISIS for
loopback recursion, but another protocol for everything else?

-- 
Stefan Fouant

Follow-Ups:
- OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
  - From: cordmacleod at gmail.com (Cord MacLeod)

References:
- OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
  - From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
  - From: cordmacleod at gmail.com (Cord MacLeod)

Prev by Date: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time
Next by Date: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
Previous by thread: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
Next by thread: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread