[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?

Subject: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
From: jabley at hopcount.ca (Joe Abley)
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:35:54 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 2010-02-14, at 17:17, Mark Andrews wrote:

> I don't care what internal routing tricks are used, they are still
> under the *one* external route and as such subject to single points
> of failure and as such don't have enough independence.

Are you asserting architectural control over what Level3 decide to do with their own servers, Mark? :-)

If their goal is distribute a service for the benefit of their own customers, then keeping all anycast nodes associated with that service on-net seems entirely sensible.

Joe

Follow-Ups:
- History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

References:
- History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
  - From: jafo at tummy.com (Sean Reifschneider)
- History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
  - From: jco at direwolf.com (John Orthoefer)
- History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)

Prev by Date: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
Next by Date: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
Previous by thread: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
Next by thread: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread