[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

dns interceptors

Subject: dns interceptors
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:33:05 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:56 EST." <[email protected]>
References: <m2vde25cex.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <m24olk4x2l.wl%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:56 EST, Steven Bellovin said:

> Yes -- and as a reward for your expertise, you get to explain the
> problem with a transparent DNS proxy to the judge.  For bonus points,
> explain it to a jury....

The transparent DNS proxies aren't the problem.  It's the translucent ones
of undetermined opacity that just don't respond to cleaning with Windex that
are the problem...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100215/9933dc7e/attachment.bin>

References:
- dns interceptors
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- dns interceptors
  - From: weaselkeeper at gmail.com (Jim Richardson)
- dns interceptors
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- dns interceptors
  - From: sean at donelan.com (Sean Donelan)
- dns interceptors
  - From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- dns interceptors
  - From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven Bellovin)

Prev by Date: DNSSEC Readiness
Next by Date: DNSSEC Readiness
Previous by thread: dns interceptors
Next by thread: dns interceptors [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread