[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Spamhaus...
On 2/20/2010 11:53 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> So we've looked at it from 2 different aspects, and in both cases, the
> RFC says you shouldn't be bouncing spam to where it came from.
Small nit, which is germane to the whole discussion; "...the RFC says
you shouldn't be bouncing spam to where IT SAYS it came from."
There is no way in the current universe to know where the item came from
by inspecting it. You can only tell where you got it from...and if you
can't reject it while you know that, you must discard it.
--
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to
take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
- References:
- Spamhaus...
- From: Louis.Laczo at PaeTec.com (Laczo, Louis)
- Spamhaus...
- From: matthew at sorbs.net (Michelle Sullivan)
- Spamhaus...
- From: Crist.Clark at globalstar.com (Crist Clark)
- Spamhaus...
- From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- Spamhaus...
- From: matthew at sorbs.net (Michelle Sullivan)
- Spamhaus...
- From: bjorn at mork.no (Bjørn Mork)
- Spamhaus...
- From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- Spamhaus...
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Spamhaus...
- From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- Spamhaus...
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Spamhaus...
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)