[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]

Subject: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
From: jmamodio at gmail.com (Jorge Amodio)
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:49:18 -0600
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <1267208530.26166.15.camel@ub-g-d2> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> ?Syria wants to roll the clock back.

Not only Syria, some developed countries want to have 100% control of
the "big switch" to turn the net off/on, if possible on a packet by
packet basis.

PTT = Prehistoric Telecommunications Technologies ...

IMHO the most important driving factor behind all these are just
politics and power.

-J

References:
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: oberman at es.net (Kevin Oberman)
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: gordslater at ieee.org (gordon b slater)
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: smb at cs.columbia.edu (Steven M. Bellovin)

Prev by Date: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Next by Date: Locations with no good Internet (was ISP in Johannesburg)
Previous by thread: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Next by thread: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread