[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]

Subject: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
From: Skeeve at eintellego.net (Skeeve Stevens)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:14:03 +1100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

 
> I believe the ITU intends to set themselves up as an alternative to
> the RIRs with a large IANA allocation, if they can get it.
> 
> --Michael Dillon

Michael,

But doesn't the IETF own the control of IPv6? Couldn't the ITU bypass IANA and get an allocation directly from them?


--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?

References:
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: awaite at tuenti.com (Adam Waite)
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: brandon.kim at brandontek.com (Brandon Kim)
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
  - From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)

Prev by Date: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Next by Date: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Previous by thread: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Next by thread: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread