[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Strange practices?
- Subject: Strange practices?
- From: furry13 at gmail.com (Jen Linkova)
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:44:10 +1000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Dale Cornman <bstymied at gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone ever heard of a multi-homed enterprise not running bgp with
> either of 2 providers, but instead, each provider statically routes a block
> to their common customer and also each originates this block in BGP? ? One
> of the ISP's in this case owns the block and has even provided a letter of
> authorization to the other, allowing them to announce it in BGP as well.
> ?I had personally never heard of this and am curious if this is a common
> practice
I have seen it quite often. It allows an enterprise to be multihomed
w/o getting PI or PA address space so they are usually pretty happy
with it.
>as well as if this would potentially create any problems by 2
> Autonomous Systems both originating the same prefix.
AFAIR prefixes can be originated by more than one AS so there
shouldn't be any issues.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry