Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

[LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)]

On 6/9/2010 01:11, JC Dill wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> Heck, at this point, I'd be OK with it being a regulatory issue. 
> 
> What entity do you see as having any possibility of effective regulatory 
> control over the internet?

Doesn't matter as long as it enables radial outbound finger pointing.

> The reason we have these problems to begin with is because there is no 
> way for people (or government regulators) in the US to control ISPs in 
> eastern Europe etc.

Or in the US.
But what we see here is what is what is wrong with "regulation"--the
regulated specify the regulation, primarily to protect the economic
interests of the entrenched.


-- 
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml