Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

[owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)]

On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:

> On 6/9/2010 15:56, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
>> 
>>> On 6/9/10 6:27 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>>> Going back then to a previous question, do we want more/any regulation ?
>>> 
>>> Laws and regulation exist because people can't behave civilly and be expected to respect the rights/boundries/property others.
>>> 
>>> CAN-SPAM exists because the e-mail marketing business refused to self regulate and respect the wishes of consumers/administrators
>>> 
>> Which is good, because it certainly eliminated most of the SPAM. -- NOT!
> 
> It is actually an outstanding example of something of something I spoke
> of here earlier.
> 
> Without any exception that I know of, regulations are written to protect
> the entrenched.  CAN-SPAM was written to protect spammers, not to
> prevent anything important to them.
> 
Actually, as much as it would make so much more sense if that were the
case, it simply isn't true.  CAN-SPAM was written to be a compromise that
was supposed to allow consumers to opt out of receiving SPAM and
prevent SPAMMERs from sending unwanted messages.

Sadly, of course, it hasn't done either one.

Owen

> -- 
> Somebody should have said:
> A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
> 
> Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
> the vote.
> 
> Requiescas in pace o email
> Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
> Eppure si rinfresca
> 
> ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
> http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
> 
>