[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Todd Underwood was a little late
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Roy <r.engehausen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/16/2010 7:43 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>>?With a larger
>> network, multiple IP blocks, ***numerous multihomed customers***, some of which
>> use IP's we've assigned them, it gets a little more complicated to do.
>> I could reject at our border, packets sourced from our IP ranges with
>> exceptions for any of the IP blocks we've assigned to multihomed customers.
>
> Sounds like a good use of URPF.
Reverse path filtering + asymmetric routing = epic fail. Jon did say
Multihomed customer.
Refer to RFC 3704 (BCP84). Note section 2.2 (Strict Reverse Path
Forwarding) last part of the final sentence: "in particular, when
applied to multihoming to different ISPs, this assumption may fail."
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004