[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

v6 Avian Carriers?

Subject: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: swm at emanon.com (Scott Morris)
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:01:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <DC8E31C01757B14EB9DFF2F0B6DA4F0C2BF0DF041F@FHDP1LUMXC7V21.us.one.verizon.com>
References: <DC8E31C01757B14EB9DFF2F0B6DA4F0C2BF0DF041F@FHDP1LUMXC7V21.us.one.verizon.com>

Mmm...  Good question.  Would it actually come back OUT in a
recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?

I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross.   ;)

Scott

On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.  So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
>
>
> Marc
>
>
>

References:
- v6 Avian Carriers?
  - From: marcus.sachs at verizon.com (Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc))

Prev by Date: HIJACKED: 159.223.0.0/16 -- WTF? Does anybody care?
Next by Date: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
Previous by thread: v6 Avian Carriers?
Next by thread: v6 Avian Carriers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread