[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
- Subject: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:01:42 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:30:45 CDT." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:30:45 CDT, =?utf-8?B?R1AgV29vZGVu?= said:
> wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
RFC1149 says:
Avian carriers can provide high delay, low throughput, and low
altitude service. The connection topology is limited to a single
point-to-point path for each carrier, used with standard carriers,
but many carriers can be used without significant interference with
each other, outside of early spring. This is because of the 3D ether
space available to the carriers, in contrast to the 1D ether used by
IEEE802.3. The carriers have an intrinsic collision avoidance
system, which increases availability.
The carriers are also (over time) self-regenerating in case one gets lost or
corrupted due to collision or interception...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110401/47499ff2/attachment.bin>