[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Top-posting (was: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to anAlternative? )
- Subject: Top-posting (was: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to anAlternative? )
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:18:30 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:49:17 BST." <EMEW3|4e6c2085e55a47e07b0847bd788d0111n3B7nJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <EMEW3|4e6c2085e55a47e07b0847bd788d0111n3B7nJ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]>
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:49:17 BST, Tim Chown said:
> Well indeed, top-posting is just so much more efficient given the
> volumes of email most of us probably see each day.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129565913825601&w=2
Go read that thread. 115 messages and counting. Read *all* of them. Then
think how much longer it would have taken if everybody had top posted.
Second note in the thread - new text is:
RIP to this guy, won't be missed :)
You *really* want to have read the context on that before reading the comment.
If top-posted, it leaves you thinking something entirely different ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110412/4ef24d75/attachment.bin>