[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Prefix announcing
- Subject: IPv6 Prefix announcing
- From: kate at quadranet.com (Kate Gerry)
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:39:02 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <3e67f6c1$2b23cd7f$74e5177b$@com> <[email protected]>
Funny enough, some carriers actually require the 'smallest' as being /32... :(
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:streiner at cluebyfour.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:34 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Prefix announcing
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Nick Olsen wrote:
> I've always been under the impression its best practice to only
> announce prefixes of a /24 and above when it comes to IPv4 and BGP.
> I was wondering if something similar had been agreed upon regarding IPv6.
> And if That's the case, What's the magic number? /32? /48? /64?
You're likely to get different answers to this, but the 'magic number'
appears to be /48. Looking in the v6 BGP table, you will likely find smaller prefixes than that, but a number of the major carriers seem to be settling on /48 as the smallest prefix they will accept. /48 is also the smallest block most of the RIRs will assign to end-users.
jms