[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OSPF vs IS-IS
- Subject: OSPF vs IS-IS
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:50:37 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CADr_k3ZUfHmWQyBu48x_0RsbEphj_XOZ+b=ygxJ0kYBk1G=2bQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CADxhdZt+CPJ9Y0Wp2HYDs=Oco5EMMPjR1yYNwNLOU8L-LwNT1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJL_ZMMsmYVuSiMgpL3s7pE7Js=GLCVEq2GoBrgGS1OYFgLSMw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAGEujU-zn2hcYt5s=jde8-Kf54HTEnR_PEE9AjWHqKUGevZiMg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
> What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
> breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
> has good experience with OSPF?
what would you rather rely on at three in the morning when things are
breaking, someone who has just learned OSPF or someone who already
has good experience with IS-IS?
this seems a silly reversal until you realize that OSPF is significantly
more complex and thus harder.
randy