[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
- Subject: East Coast Earthquake 8-23-2011
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:04:34 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAPF5agef9bSir4Q-iG=3q8UAgyXxY26_HeaKz1V0GuuCX9Uhmg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On 08/23/2011 02:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numbers) really isn't likely to do all
> that much damage, even on the East Coast. In California, anyone who
> has lived here for more than 10 years probably doesn't even feel
> anything less than a 5, and, it takes a solid 6 to really get anyone's
> attention out here. Natives mostly won't change their behavior for
> anything short of a 6.5.
>
> I would presume that on the East Coast where you have a lot more
> masonry construction you might see some minor building damage
> and a few cracked walls here and there, but it's unlikely to sever
> any underground utilities or take out any facilities.
>
> I suspect the voice network is overwhelmed because it's probably
> a newsworthy event in that area, but that will probably die down
> in a few hours after everyone finally reaches their loved ones and
> hears that everyone is OK, but, boy wasn't that exciting?
>
Raw magnitude is not a great indicator of shaking intensity.
Our rocks are much more fractured out here on the west coast
due to earthquakes, etc. A 5.9 back east is nothing to sniff at.
Mike, not a geologist
> Owen
>
> On Aug 23, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Chris wrote:
>
>
>> A friend about 80 miles near the epicenter says phones are down but
>> Comcast Internet, by way of some miracle, is up
>>
>