[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Level 3 Peering Guidelines

Subject: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:10:58 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT." <[email protected]>
References: <CAPZUUwUjCytV-X_Qx2GO6z5jwcwMCxq9O6k9+YCOSP8fMf89PQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> Next time Cogent de-peers someone, customers do not care who was being
> more reasonable.  They care that their links are broken.

Wouldn't that mostly affect people who are silly enough to single-home to a Tier-1 that
gets involved in a peering dispute?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110826/3b74c315/attachment.bin>

Follow-Ups:
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)

References:
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines
  - From: asr at latency.net (Adam Rothschild)
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Level 3 Peering Guidelines
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)

Prev by Date: Telus contact please
Next by Date: New Natural Disaster! 8/27/2011 Hurricane Irene
Previous by thread: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
Next by thread: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread