[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
- Subject: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:19:28 +0800
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnPbNEOyRrPpqUTGqfRR3YK7-hp8A+U=BM=+kqpepHnRhg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAF976C9.1B7412%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnPbNEOyRrPpqUTGqfRR3YK7-hp8A+U=BM=+kqpepHnRhg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 08:19:51 AM Ray Soucy wrote:
> There is a lot of talk about "buggy" systems that are
> unable to handle prefixes longer than 64; but I've yet
> to encounter one. I imagine if I did it would be
> treated as a bug and fixed. So to the question of
> supporting different prefix lengths: Yes. You should
> support any valid IPv6 prefix length; it takes a few
> extra lines of code in the beginning; but will save you
> a lot of re-coding in the end.
Exactly.
/126's for point-to-points, and /112's for router LAN's
here, 6 years and counting.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111202/453f0ee0/attachment.bin>