[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
De-bogon not possible via arin policy.
- Subject: De-bogon not possible via arin policy.
- From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:26:20 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAPWAtbJW-+b+mVFBDYDa=yMmJY=wu0eOp9OU95tGVdvDT3HnGg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD6AjGSiJiLj3itb1EARVpNn-xF5hMnrk97pYYjLrw=X_-XfhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAAwwbU_t0yaxYhKZrnD+9+1V=CgRBEW6vSsvZC7zYszinGj9w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbXnmQ=L7YsLoEfQ-bq8EMQa6q32SMVhqa9PT5s+TF=JZQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPWAtbJW-+b+mVFBDYDa=yMmJY=wu0eOp9OU95tGVdvDT3HnGg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/15/11 14:12 , Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Joel jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:
>> We know rather alot about the original posters' business, it has ~34
>> million wireless subscribers in north america. I think it's safe to
>> assume that adequate docuementation could be provided.
>
> I missed the post where he supplied this information.
I imagine the NANOG community to be small enough that the regular
participants should be known to each other.
Possibly naive, I know.
> I guess his
> company should have cheated the system, with full complicity of ARIN,
> like Verizon Wireless did a few years ago.
> http://marc.info/?l=nanog&m=123406577704970&w=4
I figured the discussion was for illustrative purposes more than anything.