[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- Subject: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:48:00 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:18:05 PST." <[email protected]>
- References: <CAE+sBxgt04Myw-MY_pck6=fS52uY25LA+vttsy0iXLrvPJBrHQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:18:05 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> Perhaps you have not, but, others have. I have seen environments where
> SLAAC is much more useful than DHCPv6. I've seen environments where
> DHCPv6 is needed.
OK, I'll name names. If you have end users still running WinXP, getting them
at least somewhat working under SLAAC/DHCPv4 is a lot less headache than trying
to DHCPv6 them.
Anybody managed to stamp out WinXP in their end user population yet?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111221/51c55aea/attachment-0001.bin>