[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- Subject: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:38:59 -0500
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:04:42 +0100." <[email protected]>
- References: <CAE+sBxgt04Myw-MY_pck6=fS52uY25LA+vttsy0iXLrvPJBrHQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnM=UoWHo8oXtOSeJz7ntku9NULmWfg1N0_-1kHPCg+k+A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:04:42 +0100, Tomas Podermanski said:
> Well, then how many devices do you have in the network that uses IPv6?
1,300+ wireless access points, 1,100+ switches, 30k+ users, around 55%
doing at least some IPv6 traffic (mostly when they hit Google).
> Do you have implemented first hop security? What will you do when some
> user runs RA flood attack
> (http://samsclass.info/ipv6/proj/flood-router6a.htm).
"First actual case of a bug being found" -- Lt Cmdr Grace Hopper
I've asked around, and although everybody understands it's an issue, the number
of people actually *seeing* one of these attacks is... Bueller? Bueller?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111222/1ea28b8d/attachment.bin>