[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
- Subject: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
- From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:58:51 +1100
- In-reply-to: <CAPLq3UNS4j4UVZc7P9hY7FX2gdmP-FU-W=byV+YvrEce_x9bdQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPLq3UPJqwrqeOJornSAEQjNa=b7BOB6r3XZWugHUGyLAsq9Wg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAPLq3UNS4j4UVZc7P9hY7FX2gdmP-FU-W=byV+YvrEce_x9bdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 15:37 +0530, Glen Kent wrote:
> Ok. So does SLAAC break with masks > 64?
"Break" is not the right word. SLAAC only works with /64, But that is by
design.
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017
Old fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111224/10d2e814/attachment.bin>