[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPTV and ASM
- Subject: IPTV and ASM
- From: mmcbride7 at gmail.com (Mike McBride)
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:19:14 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAJNg7VJNRA2Q-q+yqq4zKsNi2f5ro=5CXEDdg6VWkqXTsVD2UA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAL3FGfytdCQMmhG3FibqkQiLKv6KnyTv4U2o1hBUYJpG=s0_pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJNg7VJNRA2Q-q+yqq4zKsNi2f5ro=5CXEDdg6VWkqXTsVD2UA@mail.gmail.com>
Marshall,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Marshall Eubanks
<marshall.eubanks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mike;
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mike McBride <mmcbride7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyone using ASM (versus SSM) for IPTV? If so why?
>>
>
> From what I understand, the answer is likely to be "yes" and the
> reason is likely to be "deployed equipment only
> supports IGMP v2."
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non
igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other
reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is
using SSM with IPTV?
thanks,
mike
> Regards
> Marshall
>
>> thanks,
>> mike
>>
- Follow-Ups:
- IPTV and ASM
- From: jeff.tantsura at ericsson.com (Jeff Tantsura)
- IPTV and ASM
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- References:
- IPTV and ASM
- From: mmcbride7 at gmail.com (Mike McBride)
- IPTV and ASM
- From: marshall.eubanks at gmail.com (Marshall Eubanks)