[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPTV and ASM
- Subject: IPTV and ASM
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:13:19 +0800
- In-reply-to: <CAJNg7VJNRA2Q-q+yqq4zKsNi2f5ro=5CXEDdg6VWkqXTsVD2UA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAL3FGfytdCQMmhG3FibqkQiLKv6KnyTv4U2o1hBUYJpG=s0_pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJNg7VJNRA2Q-q+yqq4zKsNi2f5ro=5CXEDdg6VWkqXTsVD2UA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 05:50:58 AM Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
> >From what I understand, the answer is likely to be "yes"
> >and the
>
> reason is likely to be "deployed equipment only
> supports IGMP v2."
This is true for us - the broadcaster whose IPTv traffic we
carry supports only IGMPv2. This makes SSM a no-no, but we
aren't really complaining about having to use PIM-SM either.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111229/d644ca05/attachment-0001.bin>
- References:
- IPTV and ASM
- From: mmcbride7 at gmail.com (Mike McBride)
- IPTV and ASM
- From: marshall.eubanks at gmail.com (Marshall Eubanks)