[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
- Subject: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
- From: mtinka at globaltransit.net (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:39:27 +0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CALFTrnOPpJHhdpQLLZ5ZPWMQxoaWXcP=EBiFb-nT3FzHs2LAFA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 05:10:15 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Of course this isn't strictly true,...
Of course, not "strictly".
What I meant was the CRS and ASR9000 don't operate like the
6500/7600 and other Cisco switches that punted packets to
CPU if, for one reason or another, a bug or misconfiguration
caused said packets to be sent to the CPU for forwarding.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111229/4d7f6031/attachment.bin>