[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

Subject: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:11:24 +0900
In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaYTteHDApsS1io1=y_R4o=ArQoW5-mTqevJeST4MzLMaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9jLaYTteHDApsS1io1=y_R4o=ArQoW5-mTqevJeST4MzLMaQ@mail.gmail.com>

> yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
> predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
> Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this
> new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!

atm-2, aka mpls

Follow-Ups:
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: djahandarie at gmail.com (Darius Jahandarie)

References:
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

Prev by Date: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
Next by Date: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Previous by thread: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Next by thread: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread