[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

next-best-transport! down with ethernet!

Subject: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: tal at whatexit.org (Tom Limoncelli)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:44:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <CALFTrnOTNrinVXSjEVtESEvMOqyceRBrAGUBEFmUqmaQgFg-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9jLaYTteHDApsS1io1=y_R4o=ArQoW5-mTqevJeST4MzLMaQ@mail.gmail.com> <1325188667.2646.4.camel@teh-desktop> <D51498F0B6E1EF408AC4D63440BFD6F8CB3518EF7B@skbramsx02.emea.att.com> <CACg3zYFZB4eJA31sx2+gjVEGfzd+YoJzYn=89Or_bHFPEkNMrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALFTrnOTNrinVXSjEVtESEvMOqyceRBrAGUBEFmUqmaQgFg-8Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Ray Soucy <rps at maine.edu> wrote:
> What we really need is a new method of sending data. ?The fact that I
> will never be able to send something from Maine to California in less
> than 15 ms is not acceptable.
>
> The speed of light is such a drag.

I propose that everyone on this mailing list make it their #1 New
Years Resolution to fix this problem.  If we all work together, we can
do something about it!

Tom

-- 
http://EverythingSysadmin.com? -- my blog
http://www.TomOnTime.com?-- my videos

References:
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: tom at ninjabadger.net (Tom Hill)
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: avitkovsky at emea.att.com (Vitkovsky, Adam)
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: oscar.vives at gmail.com (Tei)
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)

Prev by Date: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Next by Date: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
Previous by thread: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Next by thread: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread