[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ipv6 question
- Subject: ipv6 question
- From: oiyankok at yahoo.ca (ann kok)
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:15:36 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <1299730291.2109.119.camel@karl>
Hi
Then I won't use this ipv6 address 2001:db8:cafe:1111::12 for test
Acutually, I have one in eth0 when I run ifconfig -a
inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1/64 Scope:Link
but I also can't ping it
ping6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
connect: Invalid argument
but ping6 ::1 is fine
ping6 ::1
PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=7.18 ms
64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.050 ms
--- On Wed, 3/9/11, Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au> wrote:
> From: Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au>
> Subject: Re: ipv6 question
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Received: Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 11:11 PM
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:43 +1100,
> Mark Andrews wrote:
> > In message <1299711449.2109.98.camel at karl>, Karl
> Auer writes:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 09:01 -0600, imNet
> Administrator wrote:
> > > > Where are you pinging it from? also, the
> 2001:db8::/32 prefix is used
> > > > for "documentation purposes" and might be
> handled differently by the
> > > > TCP/IP stack.
> > >
> > > Works fine in Linux - I've been using it (in an
> isolated training room
> > > setup) for years.
> > >
> > > Regards, K.
> >
> > It is not a good idea to use the documentation prefix
> for anything
> > other than documentation.? How hard is it to
> generate a ULA and use
> > it?
>
> I suppose I took/take the view that it *is*, in a sense,
> being used for
> documentation.
>
> The network is a training network, isolated from the
> Internet, and used
> for demonstration purposes. It's a good way to engrave the
> doco prefix
> in the students' minds. It also allows all the slides,
> exercises and
> other documentation to use the documentation prefix and yet
> directly
> match the demonstration network.
>
> ULA prefixes have little internal logic and are hard to
> remember. Not a
> problem in production, but just another barrier in a
> training
> environment. "2001:db8::/32" is very easy to remember (I
> guess that's
> the point) and easy to add easy-to-use subnets into.
>
> However, I do appreciate that it's a bit of an edge case.
> In my training
> I specifically draw the students' attention to this fact.
>
> Thanks, K.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)?
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> ???+61-2-64957160 (h)
> http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/? ? ?
> ? ? ? ? ?
> ???+61-428-957160 (mob)
>
> GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED
> 5736 F687
> Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B
> CD97 0156
>
- Follow-Ups:
- ipv6 question
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)