[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
213.123.192.0/20 | 193.179.160.0/22 | 174.132.0.0/15 | 65.75.128.0/18
Morning all - anyone here responsible for any of the following:
213.123.192.0/20 (BT-ADSL)
193.179.160.0/22 (KULAJ-NET)
174.132.0.0/15 (NETBLK-THEPLANET-BLK-15)
65.75.128.0/18 (MSG-65-75-128-0)
Abuse/Technical contacts gone unanswered for each (mailed 1 - 2 months
ago). *sigh*
Getting multiple brute force and/or spam from single IPs within those
ranges against different devices on different dates.
Gav
-----Original Message-----
From: Masato YAMANISHI [mailto:myamanis at japan-telecom.com]
Sent: 14 March 2011 16:16
To: 'Marshall Eubanks'; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
Hi Marshall and all,
> About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific
> are damaged ...
>
> It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than
> anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true.
Rgs,
Masato
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme at americafree.tv]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 8:54 AM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
>
> In this WSJ article
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487048936045761999
> 52421569210.html
>
> or
>
> http://on.wsj.com/gaPk8V
>
> This caught my eye :
>
> About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific
> are damaged ...
>
> It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than
> anything I have heard or seen.
>
> Regards
> Marshall
>
>
>