[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CSI New York fake IPv6
- Subject: CSI New York fake IPv6
- From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:35:35 -0400
- In-reply-to: <55275.1300660162@localhost>
- References: <C9ACC082.35A82%[email protected]> <55275.1300660162@localhost>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:
>
>> http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
>>
>> Promoting IPv6 = Win!
>> Dodgy Address = Fail!
>
> Intentional Fail, probably, similar to how most phone numbers on a TV show are
> in the 555 exchange. You put a number on TV, and drunk idiots will call it, as
> a number of annoyed people found out after Tommy Tutone had an actual hit
> song... 257 seems to be a popular octet value.
>
> (Personally, I'm surprised 148.18.1.193 got used in that image)
So am I. But I'm surprised 1918 space was used as well. ANY v4 address will get typed into ping or a browser or something by someone if it is on TV. How many corporations have 1918 space that their VPN'ed home users are about to abuse because of that?
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of "555"? Or will "I hurt myself, so now I'm going to sue you" mean we can't even use that?
- - --
TTFN,
patrick
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAk2GgTEACgkQznMLL4aoth+u3wCglGK+yrFj3PhI61O78IEqQ40V
KyMAoK0MJ26OxPab10za4LQ6U8qomrPU
=uJz7
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAk2GgTcACgkQznMLL4aoth9c8ACgkT0XYIAsZ2IORlYH+nopOLmH
z/sAoLILGcEnxhR1QHXnU+NvJPDuaYvT
=RNrE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----