[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 SEO implecations?

Subject: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: tshaw at oitc.com (TR Shaw)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:21:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B3F1E65@ex-mb-1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1301353811.2810.78.camel@karl> <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B3F1E65@ex-mb-1.corp.atlasnetworks.us>

On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:

>> Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, too.
> 
> I believe the concern is that the higher latency of a tunnel would impact SEO rankings.


True but you live with what you can get acces to ;-)

Tom

References:
- IPv6 SEO implecations?
  - From: wschultz at bsdboy.com (Wil Schultz)
- IPv6 SEO implecations?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- IPv6 SEO implecations?
  - From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)
- IPv6 SEO implecations?
  - From: nathan at atlasnetworks.us (Nathan Eisenberg)

Prev by Date: IPv6 SEO implecations?
Next by Date: IPv6 SEO implecations?
Previous by thread: IPv6 SEO implecations?
Next by thread: IPv6 SEO implecations?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread